17 Comments
Feb 1Liked by Susan Campbell

This is an interesting exercise. After making sure my family and I are all in mortgage free homes and money is set aside for all the kid’s’ college education I’d add to or set up endowments for a local independent living community for disabled adults and to the agency that supports my intellectually disabled wheelchair bound brother. That made me realize that although my resources are limited I should be donating what I can now of both my money and my time.

Expand full comment
author

That's a beautiful thought. I'm gathering my tax documents and realizing -- again -- I could do more.

Expand full comment
Feb 1Liked by Susan Campbell

Short of the Mars bars, your list is good. I would also buy a compound of sorts for family and friends to gather for weekends, etc. There would be home repairs so that we could place our condo on the market while we build our dream home.

Expand full comment
author

Oooh! A compound. I like that.

Expand full comment
Feb 1Liked by Susan Campbell

My list looks pretty much like yours, but instead of the Mars Bars, I would be traveling all over the US and UK, and I'd buy a home in CT and a second home someplace warm to spend the winter in.

Expand full comment
author

Oh! That's a great plan.

Expand full comment
Feb 1Liked by Susan Campbell

Help migrants pay legal bills and other living expenses until they are safely and securely residing in the US.

Expand full comment
Feb 1Liked by Susan Campbell

Pay bills, give money to my siblings, buy property for a family compound, set up a foundation to give money to organizations that tackle issues that I care about: poverty, homelessness, health care access and equity, literacy. I would also establish a program for young journalists, perhaps using the teach for America model.

Expand full comment
author

Perfect. And amen to the last one.

Expand full comment
Feb 1Liked by Susan Campbell

Pay off my bills; pay off my family's bills; go on a family vacation to Italy; give money to environmental and justice initiatives; update my bathrooms and have the house's walls and ceilings painted (not by me and my husband.) Simple stuff. That was fun. :)

Expand full comment
author

Yeah. I like my house. I’d stay.

Expand full comment
Feb 1·edited Feb 1Liked by Susan Campbell

Well there’s all the altruistic stuff but it would be self-aggrandizing to list them and that wouldn’t be…..well, altruistic. I would, however, focus locally because I don’t even have to get in the car to find any of those kind of needs. Beyond that I would sponsor musical events of all kinds. For a gritty old town we have some remarkable performance spaces, both indoor and outdoor, that are underutilized and helping to fill them up would be fun; giving the community more chances to get together.

Personally, I don’t want for much but I do always have my eye on musical instruments and as the saying goes, “I have more than I need but fewer than I want”. Plus, I’d like to gift people instruments that they wouldn’t otherwise be able to afford.

Expand full comment
founding
Feb 1Liked by Susan Campbell

Put in all in an endowment for scholars seeking the best education available to mankind at Trump University! Starch that one!!

Expand full comment
author

Starch THAT one. Love it.

Expand full comment
Feb 1Liked by Susan Campbell

There will always be bad lawyers to hire

Fat Hitler’s problem is that even the bad lawyers know Donnie one term doesn’t pay his bills

Expand full comment

Much like yours minus the Mars bars. I like the foundation idea and would establish one to aide my favorite issues, including mental health and emotional disabilities.

Expand full comment

I am Totally against rape or any type of forced sexuality of any kind. But this woman has some serious issues and no way do I believe she was raped by Trump.

25 reasons Trump won’t pay a dime to E. Jean Carroll

Gavin Mcinnes

February 02, 2024

That eye-popping $83 million judgment will not survive an appeal. A proper settlement would subtract at least $82,972,000.

In 2019, a strange woman named E. Jean Carroll accused Donald Trump of raping her in a changing room of the Bergdorf Goodman department store in Midtown Manhattan. Trump called her crazy, and a jury found him liable for both sexually abusing her and defaming her with the “crazy” talk. Last week, a New York jury decided Carroll deserves $83 million for defamation.

Here are 25 reasons why that’s nuts.

1) Carroll has said rape is “sexy”

She backs up this insane statement with, “Think of the fantasies” (which my wife and I can’t stop saying to each other). For the record, having someone forcibly violate you against your will is the exact opposite of “sexy.”

2) She’s already bragging about shopping sprees

Remember in “Goodfellas” when that idiot shows up at the party with his wife wearing a $20,000 fur coat and De Niro tells him to “bring it back”? When you run a scam, you need to lay low for a while. Carroll, conversely, is making appearances on national television telling Rachel Maddow she’s going to buy her a “penthouse in Paris” as well as fishing gear and a motorcycle for her counsel (could she pick weirder presents?). Her lawyer awkwardly murmured, “Uh, that’s a joke.”

Yeah, this whole thing is a joke.

3) The scenario she described came from her favorite TV show

She is a self-described “Law & Order” fan, and there is an episode wherein a man muscles his way into a changing room at Bergdorf Goodman and sexually molests a woman. This is likely where she got the idea. She’s also a big fan of “The Apprentice.” Would you like to watch your rapist on TV?

4) She didn’t want to press criminal charges

Being on the cover of New York magazine is one thing, but taking your BS story into an actual courtroom is a whole other level of fraud. When Bill de Blasio said he would change the law to make the case admissible, Carroll kept awkwardly repeating, “The experts told me … the time has passed.”

5) They changed the law

The case had no merit because the statute of limitations on civil action had passed. So what happened? The New York State Legislature changed the law. Is there anything that screams “witch hunt” more than that? What are we, Zimbabwe?

6) The man who backed the lawsuit is a major DNC donor

Leftist activist billionaire Reid Hoffman is the money behind this operation. His motive is obviously to bankrupt Trump so he can’t run again. Carroll denied this at first because she’s a liar, but her lawyer was forced to come clean.

7) The whole thing was George Conway’s idea, apparently

Though she denies it, it’s clear this entire plan was concocted by “conservative lawyer” Conway at a radical leftist cocktail party in Manhattan.

8) Carroll’s lawyer is desperate to fix her reputation as a rape-enabler

Roberta Kaplan was supposed to champion victims of sexual assault with her #TimesUp movement, but she used it instead to run cover for perverts such as Andrew Cuomo. She got caught and she got fired. Her comeback included representing Ashley Biden (A Biden lawyer going after Trump? Is anyone surprised?), but this case could permanently rescue her Google results.

9) Carroll’s dress didn’t exist back then

Carroll said the rape happened in the early 1990s. We just learned the particular dress she said she was allegedly wearing did not exist at the time.

10) She cannot remember when the rape happened

We’re not talking about the exact date. She can’t tell us if it was 1993 or 1995.

11) She won’t let anyone test her coat for DNA

Carroll calls the dress her “bad luck dress” and told CNN she will never make a talisman out of it — as though the idea had occurred to anyone. Why did she keep it around? This could be the left’s Monica Lewinsky dress, but she refuses to let anyone analyze it.

12) She doesn’t know if Trump ejaculated

I don’t know if anyone reading this has engaged in sexual intercourse, but evidence of the male orgasm is almost impossible to hide.

13) She is a serial accuser

Despite being a 3.5, she has claimed men have sexually assaulted her at least a half-dozen times. This isn’t proof of Trump’s innocence in and of itself, but it becomes relevant when surrounded by 24 other points.

14) She said it wasn’t sexual

Carroll has said pretty much everything that you could say about this encounter, from “it was not sexual” to “it was the definition of rape.” She said she would not press charges, however, because it would trivialize the experience of illegal aliens who are being “raped around the clock.”

15) She’s not his type

Trump is into elegant Slavs. This woman is like that hysterical chicken lady from “The Kids in the Hall.”

16) The judge and Carroll’s lawyer are pals

We’re told Judge Lewis Kaplan was Roberta Kaplan’s (no relation) mentor back when they both worked at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison. Roberta Kaplan denies this, but it can’t be denied they worked at the same firm at the same time. That alone is a conflict of interest.

17) Carroll didn’t talk to anyone about the alleged assault, until she did

If a woman is sexually assaulted, she is morally obligated to report it immediately, so the rapist doesn’t do it again. Carroll did not do this. What’s more, she didn’t talk to any of her friends about it. At least not at first. This is peculiar behavior for a blabbermouth.

18) Even if it’s all true, the settlement would be tiny

Carroll alleged that Trump cost her a columnist job at Elle, but the magazine made it clear it ended her contract as an advice columnist based on nothing more than lack of interest. But let’s assume Elle fired her because Trump wrote a mean tweet. A good price for an advice column would be a couple of hundred bucks per piece. That’s $2,000 a year for Elle. Assuming Carroll lives as long as “Dear Abby” columnist Pauline Esther Friedman, who died at 94, that would be a whopping total of $28,000 (Carroll is 80).

So, we’re off by about $82,972,000.

19) She said women “love” being abducted

She told Charlie Rose (remember him?) in 1995 that women love the idea of a caveman knocking them unconscious with a club and then dragging them — by their hair — back to the cave. I’m no feminist, but I’m pretty sure the cerebral contusions from this kind of violence are not a turn-on.

20) She said it wasn’t a big deal

“I’m a mature woman,” she said. “I can handle it.” OK, then why does she need $83 million to recover? That’s four times the amount of money you get when your kid is decapitated.

21) She lives in a Mouse House

Anyone who doubts this lady’s mental state needs to check out her house. She calls it “The Mouse House” because it’s infested with rodents (to whom she has given individual names, such as “Terbrusky”). She has painted the trees blue. She has printed out 27 years of advice column questions and stacked them all over the place. Yes, writers can be weird. But it is impossible to look at her place and not think, “This is nuts.”

22) She is a hoarder

Hoarding is a mental disorder. You can’t sue someone for calling you “crazy” if you have a mental disorder.

23) Her cat is called “Vagina” — seriously

E. Jean Carroll is obsessed with sex and her vagina. She said she lives in the woods because if she lived in the city, she’d have 16 boyfriends. She’s 80, remember?

Her dog “Tits” has blue hair, and her cat is named “Vagina.” The left-wing media thinks this is irrelevant. “Among the stranger complaints made by the former president … was that the jury wasn’t informed about the name of his accuser’s cat: Vagina T. Fireball.” Uh, when the charge is “calling a sane woman crazy,” Vagina T. Fireball matters.

24) She writes notes to herself

Wait, doesn’t everyone do that? Not like this. “The Mouse House” is festooned with bizarre messages. Her microwave says, “Burn Baby Burn.” Her bookshelf says, “Always amused never angry.” And, in a moment of deranged honesty, she taped a note to a lamp that says, “Hold your nerve. Pursue your radical options to the bitter END!”

25) Carroll said she wanted to “rape” Trump

Apparently, she thought having rough sex with him in the changing room would make for a “funny story.” (Wait, I thought she didn’t tell anyone about what happened to her out of fear.) She also suggested she’d do it for $17,000 if he was unable to speak. Sounds awfully rapey, doesn’t it?

Anyone who takes this case seriously and doesn’t see E. Jean Carroll as a complete basket case is a complete basket case.

Expand full comment