If you’ve read this Substack long enough, you know I am not a paragon of grammar, a defender of the beloved language, or even all that careful when I write.
I’m human. Sue me.
But when I see the above kind of faux pas on public signs, I notice. I don’t precisely stand and shake an angry fist, but I almost wish I didn’t notice because it makes me seem — I don’t know — entirely too precious.
When I wrote for the Hartford Courant, on more than one occasion, I heard from a retired English professor who thought my grasp of grammar was subpar. At the time, I read her letters (this is how far back we’re going, people wrote letters) with an equal mix of defensiveness and a yearning that I’d had this professor in my formative years. I never learned what is a subjunctive clause, just as I never had tennis lessons. Instead, I picked up the racket and whacked away, learning as I went (or not).
I am older now and I have let a lot of that defensiveness go because part of growing up is not getting too bogged down in being perfect. These days, I look at language as I look at the Constitution. It is a living and breathing thing. The basic premise is bedrock, but we cannot hope to keep the same rules created by dead white men in the long-ago.
Did you ever read “The Canterbury Tales” in the original English?
Whan that Aprille with his shoures soote,
The droghte of March hath perced to the roote,
And bathed every veyne in swich licóur
Of which vertú engendred is the flour;
We don’t talk like that any more. We don’t spell like that any more, either. It is one reason I cannot read Jane Austen and please don’t take away my feminist decoder ring. The beloved author takes a page and a half to walk a character down the stairs. Throw in a car wreck, and I might get interested.
Regardless, there are some writerly rules that feel inviolate to me though I couldn’t necessarily articulate why. I think about that when I listen to people whose politics aren’t mine, who purport to Keep Things The Way They Are. They’re focused on rules that feel important to them, and people like us crap things up for everyone else.
I would argue that my focus on grammar has far less impact on people’s lives than do some conservatives’ concerns about gay or trans rights, say. But I get the instinct, sadly.
A very dear, and no longer with us, internet friend who was a teacher loved getting into online "battles", especially when it came to politics. She was a rather smart cookie and watching her engage, while correcting people's grammar, was beyond entertaining (especially with her cousin, Linda, who was a real speshul kind of speshul). That being said... my education, through 5th grade, was in German schools. There was a little bit of Spanish thrown in for preK through 1st grade (Mexico City) and some English (MD) for 2nd and 3rd, and the rest total German immersion. I'm not 100% perfect when it comes to grammar, but I know I'm a hella better than a lot of people my not-so-traditional schooling notwithstanding. And this sign... it hurts my brain. It hurts my eyes.
Apostrophes for plural words (and numbers, like 1980s) are my personal grammar hangup, too. Cringy. That and sentence fragments inartfully dividing a perfectly fine sentence. (see what I did there) I created special "Quick Notes" for these on Turntin for grading paper :)